docs(708): record the live route-2 reproduction against PR #761

Pushed application code onto Renovate PR #761's branch and captured the
review-verdict/h10 the gate posted: pending, with the classifier logging
"authored by the 'renovate' bot account, but changes files outside the
dependency-manifest set". Route 2 of #698 is refused on the live instance
after PR #705; identity alone no longer exempts a head.

Also records two things the issue got wrong or did not anticipate: the
refusal reason surfaces only in the job log, never in the status
description, and re-running the gate on the PR's ORIGINAL head tripped
#751's page-2 "assume raced" rule, which is the live instance of #763
that issue predicts.

Cold review found two defects in the first draft, both fixed here: the
repair paragraph said "that head", which reads as the probe head when the
repair in fact fired on the original head from the title edit five minutes
earlier; and "every non-exempt head gets the generic description" was false,
since the raced-repair sentinel is also a non-exempt description.

PR #761 was restored to its recorded sha and verified byte-identical.

fixes #708

Decisions-Edit: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/decisions/records/ci/exemption-provenance.md

@@ -90,5 +90,32 @@ a PR, because `pull_request_target` resolves this definition from `main` — the
 executed-behaviour tests in `scripts/tests/test_pr_changed_files.py`, each verified by mutation; the
 live re-check happens on `main` right after merge.
 
+**Route 2 was reproduced live 2026-08-26 (#708), and it is REFUSED.** Application code was pushed onto
+the branch of Renovate PR #761 (guarded first with a `WIP:` title prefix, confirmed `draft: true` /
+`mergeable: false`, so the hijacked head could not merge), then the branch was force-restored to its
+recorded sha and the PR verified byte-identical across title, head sha, base ref, draft, mergeable,
+state, labels, body hash, author and milestone. With `AUTHOR: renovate` and a changed set of
+`Directory.Packages.props` **and** `ErsatzTV.Core/Probe708.cs`, the classifier logged
+`Decision: state=pending — authored by the 'renovate' bot account, but changes files outside the
+dependency-manifest set`, and posted `review-verdict/h10=pending`. Before the manifest allow-list the
+same head would have been `success` on identity alone. The classify step's start marker was present,
+so this is a real classification and not the #751 silent no-op.
+
+**Where the refusal reason surfaces — the log, NOT the status description.** The route-2 explanation
+lives in `reason`, which is only `echo`ed as `Decision: state=… — <reason>`. Of the three description
+branches, two are distinctive — `Exempt: <reason>` and the raced-repair sentinel `REPAIR_DESC` — and
+every *other* non-exempt head falls to the generic `Awaiting review verdict for <sha7>`. So a Route-2
+bot refusal and an ordinary awaiting-verdict head are indistinguishable from the status alone;
+confirming *which branch* the classifier took means reading the job log. #708's own text expected the
+reason in the description; it is not there.
+
+**Cost observed on the same PR, on its ORIGINAL head — not a defect in this record's mechanism.**
+Re-running the gate on `8798a1d2` (the unmutated head, re-triggered by the `WIP:` title edit via
+`types: [… edited]`, and five minutes *before* the code push) repaired its exemption to `pending` via
+#751's conservative page-2 rule: that head's status history runs past `MAX_RESPONSE_ITEMS`, so *any*
+page-2 rows are assumed raced. It could not have happened on the probe head — the page-2 check sits on
+the `exempt=yes` path, which a Route-2 refusal never reaches. That is the blunt-instrument case `#763`
+already predicts, now with a live instance of it; see that issue.
+
 **Separate defect found reviewing this change:** `ci.grep-q-pipefail-inversion` — a pre-existing
 SIGPIPE inversion that let a large PR skip the `PROTECTED` guard entirely. Fixed in the same PR.