4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
timothy	893d4a6398	test(67): de-vacuify the template-stamping assertion; cover adopt-then-delete ... Whole-branch review found the stamping test was structurally vacuous: a bare foreach over ChannelTemplates.Where(IsSystem) passes with zero iterations, so the test would have stayed green if template seeding silently bailed out. Assert the collection is non-empty first. Proven non-vacuous by a negative control (forcing SeedChannelTemplates to bail makes exactly this test fail). Also cover the ACTUAL production sequence -- adopt an existing hand-made row, then delete it -- which the previous no-resurrect test did not exercise (it covered seed-then-delete). The marker is written on the adopt path too, so the deleted row must stay deleted. docs: note that a deleted preset degrades to no default rather than failing, and that the default applies to newly created channels, not retroactively. Refs #67	2026-07-20 21:13:47 +02:00
timothy	bb7f57d04d	docs(67): record the shared-preset decision, watermark seeding, and the additive DTO field	2026-07-20 20:48:14 +02:00
timothyandClaude Opus 4.8	62c15da490	docs(73): document seasonal / date-conditional scheduling (already implemented) ... fixes #73 #73's premise ("ErsatzTV has no native date-conditional scheduling today") is false. The predicate (IAlternateScheduleItem) is shipped on both engines, evaluated by AlternateScheduleSelector, reachable from the SPA, and already unit-tested — so the only real gap was discoverability, and it was a docs gap: the mechanism was documented as a mechanism, never as a task. - channels.md: task-shaped "Recipe: seasonal / holiday programming" for both engines, plus the gotchas — chiefly that blank StartYear/EndYear is what makes a range repeat every year (AlternateScheduleSelector.cs:32-40), that the override branch needs BOTH years, and that explicit years disable wrap-around detection. - domain-model.md: glossary row (mirrors the #77 "already exists" row). - decisions.md: entry recording the verdict and the rejected asks — notably that "prioritize collection X during a date range" is #70's weighting problem, not a second primitive built here while #70 is mid-flight. No production code changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-17 09:20:05 +02:00
timothyandClaude Opus 4.6	f1e97b94a7	Add architecture docs and fork maintenance strategy (#6) ... Document channel architecture, M3U/XMLTV integration with Jellyfin, and fork maintenance strategy for the archived upstream. Also includes CLAUDE.md updates for implementer workflow and project boundaries. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-03-17 22:42:07 +01:00