Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
timothyandtimothy d4c72697f2 feat(780): commit a ruff config and enforce it in CI (#813)
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (push) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (push) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Delimiter ban (release path) (push) Successful in 28s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (push) Successful in 8m29s
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (push) Successful in 5m54s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (push) Successful in 5m59s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (push) Failing after 15s
Python lint here was a property of the operator's laptop: the global instructions
say to run ruff, no workflow ran it, and with no committed config ruff fell back
to whichever ~/.config/ruff/ruff.toml the machine happened to have.

- ruff.toml at the root, pinned ruff==0.12.11 in the script-tests job.
- Both lint steps pass an EXPLICIT population from `git ls-files` with
  `--no-force-exclude`, never `ruff check .` — an `exclude` empties a
  discovery-based run into a GREEN one (top level empties both commands, [lint]
  empties check, [format] empties format --check), and `ruff check .` over zero
  files exits 0 with only a stderr warning. Guarded by an empty-population arm.
- Tree clean: 74 findings at 706674272, 57 fixed in code, 17 per-site noqa with
  reasons inline. S105 deliberately per-site, not a directory blanket. RUF100
  selected so a suppression that suppresses nothing is itself a finding.
- pyright stays ungated; reasoning in the record.

Both steps witnessed red on the runner against the shipped bodies: run 2173 job
9176 (ruff check) and run 2170 job 9163 (ruff format --check).

Docs: new record ci.python-lint-ruff-config-committed, ci.script-tests-job
cross-ref, docs/ci-cd.md (also correcting a stale ~190-tests/~10s figure to the
measured 773 tests / ~4.5 min), docs/defect-shapes-773.md §5.2 resolved.

fixes #780

Co-authored-by: Timothy <timothy@noreply.gitea.tblindustries.be>
2026-08-22 00:33:18 +00:00
15d2439915 feat(794): witness a fix's test failing BEFORE the fix, and check the claim in CI (#801)
Build ErsatzTV Image / Delimiter ban (release path) (push) Successful in 19s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (push) Successful in 9m26s
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (push) Successful in 6m31s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (push) Successful in 6m14s
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (push) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (push) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (push) Successful in 4m30s
Mechanises the defect that took #776 and #793 six review rounds each: a fix's test
written to confirm the fix, not to discriminate against its absence.
testing.guard-ships-with-mutation-proof generalised from guards to fixes.

prove-fix.sh runs the selector at the commit (control, must be GREEN) and again in a
separate fresh worktree with the non-test files reverted (must be RED = pytest exit 1
exactly; 2/3/4/5/143 are refused, and --continue-on-collection-errors keeps add-a-file
fixes provable). pytest's status comes from a marker written only after it returns,
because ( cd X && pytest ); rc=$? returns the SUBSHELL's status. Opt-in by a Proves:
trailer; CI checks every commit that carries one and says out loud when a PR has none.

THE TOOL REJECTED ITS OWN AUTHOR. Three commits on the branch claimed
Proves: scripts/tests/test_prove_fix.py; the job returned UNPROVEN for all three,
because reverting the script restored a working earlier version the suite also passed.
Two had been "verified" against hand-written mutants that did not match the code that
actually shipped. The tests were rewritten until both go RED against 587edbecc — whose
script emits "red without it (pytest exit 2)", a witnessed false PROVEN.

This branch deliberately carries no Proves: trailer: the only one that would pass does
so because reverting deletes prove-fix.sh, an add-file smoke check rather than a proof
of its logic. The logic proof is a clause-level mutation that re-runs the unchanged
refusal test against a mutant and witnesses it red (graded MUTATION).

fixes #794

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Timothy <timothy@noreply.gitea.tblindustries.be>
2026-08-16 10:24:59 +00:00