timothyandClaude Opus 5
356cddbb59
PR Gates / CI image pin matches docker/ci (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Delimiter ban (release path) (pull_request) Successful in 27s
PR Gates / Docs update reminder (pull_request) Successful in 14s
PR Gates / decisions lifecycle (pull_request) Successful in 20s
PR Gates / Fix proofs (Proves trailers) (pull_request) Successful in 18s
review-verdict/h10 Awaiting review verdict for 356cddb
Review verdict / Set review-verdict status (pull_request_target) Successful in 44s
PR Gates / Script tests (pytest) (pull_request) Successful in 4m17s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (pull_request) Successful in 9m3s
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (pull_request) Successful in 6m12s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (pull_request) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (pull_request) Successful in 6m1s
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (pull_request) Successful in 7s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (pull_request) Successful in 5s
Two self-found defects while pre-empting the confirmation round's own questions. THE REORDER WAS UNPINNED. Swapping the classifier arms back to exact-first left all 29 tests green, so the previous commit's central change was invisible to the suite — an unproven change shipping under a green run. The missing fixture is the one that distinguishes the orders: a list holding BOTH an exactly-named rule that requires `review-verdict/h10` AND a glob rule that could also govern the base and does not. Exact-first inspects the rule that requires h10 and auto-grants; undecidable-first asks. Now mutation-proven in both directions. I HAD MISDIAGNOSED THE TRAP, and asserted the wrong cause in a comment. A three-line repro disproves "an EXIT trap suppresses output" — it does not. The real mechanism is that this file already owns its EXIT trap: `scripts/hook-fire-log.sh` installs `trap 'etv_hook_fire_end "$?"' EXIT` (#776), and in capture mode that handler is what REPLAYS the decision JSON to stdout. A second `trap ... EXIT` silently replaces it, so the decision is captured and never emitted. The trap slot is a single shared resource and the sourced library claimed it first. That second one is the shape this whole PR is about, committed against my own work: an explanation that fits the symptom, is written down as fact, and is wrong. It would have told the next person the construct is unusable rather than that the slot is taken. refs #778 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>