Files
ersatztv/scripts/tests
timothyandClaude Opus 5 fc65b5fbe3 docs(776,784): state the hazard, not the author's timeline
Applies ersatztv#784's who-benefits test to this change's own prose: if only
the author's timeline explains why a sentence is there, it is narrative. Three
comments said "the first version of this did X" where the reader only needs the
hazard and the reason nothing downstream would catch it.

One of the three turned into a real correction rather than a reword. The
byte-exactness test was justified as "the A/B does not cover this", which is
sharper and also true: the A/B compares the two halves against each other, so a
wrapper that truncated BOTH would pass it. Only comparing against the literal
expected bytes catches that.

Refs: #776
Refs: #784

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 18:52:57 +02:00
..