Self-review over the fix commit, on the same predicate the record states.
The cost band said 13-17% over measurements spanning 12.7% to 16.6% - a band
that ROUNDS is still a band the data does not support at its lower edge. It now
states 12.7-16.6%, which is the span itself, with the per-pair figures beside it.
The quote-scope rule was stated as an OUTCOME claim ("free to be rewritten under
a green harness", "with the entry still reporting the red as verified") in the
record's `rule`, in the manifest preamble and beside the entry. That is a
mutation-outcome claim about the harness with no `CLAIMS` entry behind it -
manufactured by the sentence that introduces the rule against it. All three now
state the STRUCTURE, which is what a reader can check by looking: the assertion
and the test it names are outside the binding.
The manifest preamble said "three of the entries below assert that a mutation is
NOT noticed". `CLAIMS` holds three entries and exactly ONE is GREEN; the three
the `Claim` docstring names are CORPUS sites, not entries. Corrected to one, and
"the most common shape prose actually takes" - a frequency nothing measured -
dropped rather than quantified.
Two claims in the new record prose were themselves overstated. The 69-line green
narrowing was described as the negative direction rather than as candidates for
it: sampling the hits shows `green` in this corpus is as often a CI job's colour
as a mutation's outcome, so both figures are now labelled CANDIDATE counts. And
the "the number moves under the commit that records it" sentence now carries the
figure that shows it - the same command with `HEAD` in place of the sha prints
`107 files, 344 lines`, measured on the committed tree.
refs #881
Decisions-Edit: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QqCpYFsKgnAnx6jVwrKiV
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1
11e4d74256