Files
ersatztv/docs/decisions/records
timothyandClaude Opus 5 9da0020462
Build ErsatzTV Image / CI toolchain image resolves (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Delimiter ban (release path) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Gates / Docs update reminder (pull_request) Successful in 14s
PR Gates / decisions lifecycle (pull_request) Successful in 16s
PR Gates / Fix proofs (Proves trailers) (pull_request) Successful in 12s
PR Gates / CI image pin matches docker/ci (pull_request) Successful in 13s
review-verdict/h10 Review-verdict: MERGEABLE @ 9da0020 (base: main)
Review verdict / Set review-verdict status (pull_request_target) Successful in 14s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (pull_request) Successful in 9m53s
PR Gates / Script lint and tests (ruff + pytest) (pull_request) Successful in 19m17s
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (pull_request) Successful in 6m47s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (pull_request) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (pull_request) Successful in 6m2s
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (pull_request) Successful in 7s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (pull_request) Successful in 5s
docs(887): sweep the withdrawal through the record — it still described the withdrawn pin
Round 9 returned MERGEABLE with BLOCKER and HIGH empty. Every remaining item was a
sentence, and every one erred by UNDERSTATING the guard — which is the safe direction and
still worth fixing, because the decision record is what CLAUDE.md routes convention
lookups to.

The record's `rule:` still listed "`web/vite.config.ts`'s `test:` block" among the pinned
things — the very mechanism the previous commit withdrew — and named only `vitest.config.*`
as the outranking family, omitting `vite.config.js`/`.mjs`, which is the MEASURED attack
from round 7 (a `web/vite.config.js` ran the suite in the gitless stage with 1411 tests
green). That family went short in round 7 and again in round 8. This is
`enumerate-CLAUSES-to-close-a-sweep`: the survivors were phrased in a different category
(WHAT is pinned) from the retracted claim (HOW it is extracted), so sweeping for the
retracted words missed them.

Also: "any edit to this file reddens, including a comment" was an absolute and is
refutable — a reindent, added blank lines, tabs, and a form feed all stay green, because
`_normalise_lines` collapses whitespace. Restated as what is actually true (a line's TOKEN
sequence, a comment's words included) plus the reason the tolerance is currently inert:
this file has no template literal and no ASI-sensitive token outside a comment. And a YAML
single-quote escape had leaked from the frontmatter into the markdown BODY, where `''`
renders literally.

No code change; the guard is unchanged and still 73/0.

Refs: #887
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019T79beF1Ufid3dXju4yqkF
2026-08-30 17:14:22 +02:00
..