timothyandtimothy
d68ce42fcb
Build ErsatzTV Image / CI toolchain image resolves (push) Successful in 12s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Delimiter ban (release path) (push) Successful in 27s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (push) Successful in 8m47s
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (push) Successful in 6m55s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (push) Successful in 6m0s
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (push) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (push) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (push) Successful in 4m25s
`review-verdict.yml` decided whether an existing `review-verdict/h10` was worth INHERITING by testing `.creator.login != null` — satisfied by any account's credential, including the `renovate` bot's `RENOVATE_TOKEN`, a `write:repository` PAT that cannot be scoped down the way #697 scoped the registry credential. The test is now membership in `H10_REVIEWERS="timothy"`, a literal in the base-resolved definition. The design that survived 11 cold review rounds: * `read_existing_verdict` carries TWO flags. `ex_human` (attributable AND allow-listed) gates INHERITANCE; `ex_attributable` gates the last-moment re-read, which asks the opposite question and must stay broad. Narrowing both — the first draft — makes the job post its exemption over a mid-run rejection, and the post-write repair does not cover that. * The two calls no longer compute an identical predicate, so "changed" is made explicit: the state/creator/description triple from the first read is snapshotted and compared. * The allow-list governs an inherited `success` ONLY. An existing `failure` inherits on attributability alone, because inheriting a rejection can only withhold an exemption while re-deriving one can turn it green on an exempt PR. A symmetric rule was a measured fail-open. * The post-write raced check stays broad — not because narrowing would let a rejection go green (a real reviewer is on the list by construction), but for the misconfiguration case. Two mechanisms were WITHDRAWN rather than patched a third time, and both withdrawals are recorded in `ci.exemption-provenance` so they are not re-attempted: a `::warning::` annotation that produced three defects in three rounds, and a post-write fix whose generic `pending` would have been re-derived anyway and which had no retry trigger. Verified: the inheritance predicate driven against the LIVE Gitea API on a probe-named context, both allow-list directions; every clause mutation-proven against the shipped file; `scripts/tests` 1012 passed, 2 skipped. Follow-ups filed: #845 (post-review-verdict.sh does not check its own account is allow-listed) and #849 (post-write verification: three routes leaving an exemption `success` over a human `failure`, plus the retarget fence's post-POST gap, plus the prose sweep that lands with the behaviour). fixes #742 Co-authored-by: Timothy <timothy@noreply.gitea.tblindustries.be>