Files
ersatztv/web
timothyandClaude Opus 5 689451161e
PR Gates / CI image pin matches docker/ci (pull_request) Successful in 14s
PR Gates / Docs update reminder (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Review verdict / Set review-verdict status (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Gates / decisions lifecycle (pull_request) Successful in 20s
PR Gates / Script tests (pytest) (pull_request) Successful in 51s
review-verdict/h10 Review-verdict: MERGEABLE @ 6894511 (base: main)
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (pull_request) Successful in 6m33s
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (pull_request) Successful in 27s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (pull_request) Successful in 6m17s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (pull_request) Successful in 21m38s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (pull_request) Has been skipped
fix(684): review round 2 -- drop a false exhaustiveness claim I introduced
The L1 fix (name every class-b shape) collided with the M1 fix (move
SmartCollectionDialog into class-b) in the same commit: the comment claimed
"exactly three shapes, which is the whole list" while the registry 80 lines
below already held four. That is the same false-exhaustiveness defect this PR
exists to remove -- a reader adding a fifth class-b site would conclude theirs
cannot be class-b despite rendering a real totalCount hint, and reach for
search-bounded or deviation.

The operative rule is now stated first and the shape list is explicitly
illustrative: a site qualifies by RENDERING a totalCount-backed hint, not by
resembling a listed shape.

Also, both non-blocking review items:
- the deviation prose said the tracking issue goes "in the note", while
  enforcement is on the structural `issue` field -- it now points at the
  mechanism that actually binds, and says why the note scrape was rejected;
- the UNREGISTERED report prints every position sharing an identity, so it now
  says "identity seen at:" rather than implying all of them are unregistered. A
  positionless key cannot know which occurrence is excess; the candidate set is
  the honest answer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 19:17:07 +02:00
..
2026-07-07 10:05:39 +02:00
2026-07-02 18:36:56 +02:00
2026-07-07 10:05:39 +02:00