8 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1	ff65e5e7c9	fix(881): the docstring quoted an outcome the branch had already narrowed ... The `Claim` docstring motivated the GREEN direction by enumerating three corpus sites and restating what each asserts. The middle restatement said `scripts/check-doc-narrative.py` "says removing its `/dev/null` arm reddens no test" — the universal a9341d841 removed from that file when it narrowed the comment to the scope the harness actually executes ("`test_check_doc_narrative.py` stays green with this arm removed"). The docstring was written before that narrowing and kept re-asserting the wider claim, attributed to a file that no longer makes it: `git grep -F "reddens no test"` returned exactly one hit, the line asserting it. That is #881's own defect #2 reproduced inside the fix. Restating an outcome is what makes it drift, so the enumeration now names the three sites and the mutation each describes, states the shape they share, and says why the outcome wording is not repeated. The only two copies of that outcome left in the tree are the site comment and the `CLAIMS` quote bound to it, which is the binding by construction. Both other members were re-checked today and hold: `.gitea/workflows/review-verdict.yml:2411` and `scripts/tests/hook_fire_isolation.py:82`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QqCpYFsKgnAnx6jVwrKiV	2026-09-05 06:25:54 +02:00
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1	a9341d8415	fix(881): a GREEN claim is only readable if its proof REACHES the clause ... Round three found the one half of the new mechanism with no relevance gate. `verify_claim`'s GREEN path read exactly two things — the run exited 0, and something PASSED — and both are satisfied by a proof that never touches the mutated file at all. Reproduced before fixing: retargeting the shipped GREEN entry's proof from `test_check_doc_narrative.py` to `test_bom_guard_detection.py` changed nothing, and the entry still reported verified. The RED direction never had this hole, because a proof that ignores the mutation stays green and is refused as "the clause is not load-bearing". So a GREEN entry now declares a `reach_replacement` and its `reach_expect`: a SECOND mutation of the SAME clause, required to REDDEN the same proof, executed through `verify_mutation` so its red is read through the diagnostic gate rather than on exit status. The shipped entry declares `path = p` — dropping the `b/` stripping every scanned diff header goes through — and the run then scans NOTHING, which is what the declared diagnostic reads. The same retarget now fails, naming the reach verdict. The gate runs LAST of the three: run first it would refuse before the status and vacuity gates were read and neither could be witnessed failing alone (#685), and the sandbox is reset between a claim's two proof runs for the reason it is reset between mutations. It has its own disarm proof, and the two synthetic claim sandboxes are now real git repositories so `reset_sandbox` has a baseline; `_lib_with` shares the baseline registry, since a copied module's own starts empty. Also from that round: - The record no longer counts the mutation-outcome claims in the pinned proposal-3 scan. A third of the same shape sits in the same result set (`test_a_verdict_BEYOND_A_SHORT_PAGE_is_still_found`), and which side of the line a sentence falls on is a judgement, so an exact count is a figure the next reader re-derives differently — the failure this record is about. - The calibration paragraph no longer restates the post-review-verdict outcome as a dated witnessing. It points at the `CLAIMS` entry that executes it, which is the form the rewritten shell comment beside it demands. - The comment in `check-doc-narrative.py` claimed a universal ("reddens no test") while one file is executed. It now names that file, so the quote binds an outcome no wider than what is checked. - Proposal 4 from the issue is dispositioned explicitly: rejected as a rule here, on the issue's own argument that an exhortation does not fire at the moment of least slack. - `docs/README.md`'s task-signal parenthetical now names the `CLAIMS` population; the file was owned by another slot when this branch started. Cost re-measured 2026-09-05, three baseline/branch pairs: the `CLAIMS` half adds 31.7-43.6%, up from the 12.7-16.6% measured before the gate existed. The old figure is retired rather than scaled — growing the population invalidates the measurement that described it. Refs #881 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QqCpYFsKgnAnx6jVwrKiV	2026-09-05 05:02:46 +02:00
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1	11e4d74256	fix(881): three more claims in my own fix, and a cost band that rounded outward ... Self-review over the fix commit, on the same predicate the record states. The cost band said 13-17% over measurements spanning 12.7% to 16.6% - a band that ROUNDS is still a band the data does not support at its lower edge. It now states 12.7-16.6%, which is the span itself, with the per-pair figures beside it. The quote-scope rule was stated as an OUTCOME claim ("free to be rewritten under a green harness", "with the entry still reporting the red as verified") in the record's `rule`, in the manifest preamble and beside the entry. That is a mutation-outcome claim about the harness with no `CLAIMS` entry behind it - manufactured by the sentence that introduces the rule against it. All three now state the STRUCTURE, which is what a reader can check by looking: the assertion and the test it names are outside the binding. The manifest preamble said "three of the entries below assert that a mutation is NOT noticed". `CLAIMS` holds three entries and exactly ONE is GREEN; the three the `Claim` docstring names are CORPUS sites, not entries. Corrected to one, and "the most common shape prose actually takes" - a frequency nothing measured - dropped rather than quantified. Two claims in the new record prose were themselves overstated. The 69-line green narrowing was described as the negative direction rather than as candidates for it: sampling the hits shows `green` in this corpus is as often a CI job's colour as a mutation's outcome, so both figures are now labelled CANDIDATE counts. And the "the number moves under the commit that records it" sentence now carries the figure that shows it - the same command with `HEAD` in place of the sha prints `107 files, 344 lines`, measured on the committed tree. refs #881 Decisions-Edit: yes Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QqCpYFsKgnAnx6jVwrKiV	2026-09-05 04:44:29 +02:00
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1	4008f4b574	fix(881): exempt the claim binding from the index-population registry, and fix three prose claims in the change itself ... `test_mutation_harness.py` now imports the shared index derivation, which `test_every_index_derived_module_is_registered` requires be registered or exempt. It is exempt: its population is `CLAIMS`, and it consults the index only per member, to answer whether a declared `site` is a path git tracks. The exemption list's own docstring counted its entries, so that count and its review date move with it. Three claims written by this change were falsified by this change, which is the shape it exists to catch: - the binding test's docstring said membership comes from the index "not from `Path.is_file`", while the same test now asserts existence with `is_file`; - the record quoted the manifest docstring this change rewrites — an anchor to a state the commit moves, which the record itself rejects. It now anchors to `efadbec29`; - the `Claim` docstring quoted three files without naming them. They are named. refs #881 Decisions-Edit: yes Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QqCpYFsKgnAnx6jVwrKiV	2026-09-05 04:44:29 +02:00
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1	1fc24e8cf6	fix(881): a mutation-outcome claim is executed wherever it is written, bound to the sentence that makes it ... `testing.mutation-claims-are-executed` was the right rule scoped to its first site: `mutation_manifest.py` declared itself "one per `MUTATION`-graded row of `docs/guard-inventory.md`", so the same claim written in a code comment, a test docstring or a decision record was outside it by construction. That is where all four of ersatztv#812's consecutive review-round defects lived. Extend the rule in place rather than adding a sibling record: a sibling would recreate the exact shape (a rule per site class, with the next site class outside both) that #773, #784 and #743 each are. The subject is unchanged; only the population widens. Mechanism: `CLAIMS` in `scripts/tests/mutation_manifest.py`, keyed on the PROSE. Each entry carries the tracked `site` and the verbatim `quote`, checked every run, so a reworded sentence reports as a retarget instead of drifting from the entry that justifies it — this is proposal 2 (a quotation of another file is a claim about that file) adopted where the referent is declared. Each entry also declares RED or GREEN and is executed in the existing sandbox. GREEN is new: 47 of the 128 candidate lines the corpus grep returns at efadbec29 assert that a mutation is NOT noticed, and no `MUTATION` row can express that, so the rule was unsatisfiable for them. The green direction is read by two separate clauses (exited 0, and something actually passed) so neither can mask the other, and each carries its own disarm proof. Proposal 3 (never anchor prose to a state your own commit moves) is rejected as a DETECTOR and kept as a phrasing rule: measured 2026-09-04, the only plausible pattern set for it matched 16 lines across the scanned corpus and every one was legitimate rationale prose. The seed set falsified a shipped claim on its first run: `post-review-verdict.sh` asserted that disarming its array-TYPE read-back test left the suite green. It does not — jq refuses to iterate a `null` `.statuses` and the script dies with the parse message, reddening `test_a_readback_whose_statuses_array_is_NULL_is_refused`. Comment corrected, entry graded RED. fixes #881 Decisions-Edit: yes Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015QqCpYFsKgnAnx6jVwrKiV	2026-09-05 04:44:28 +02:00
timothyandClaude Fable 5.1	a7d91bf15a	fix(876): sweep session narrative out of hooks, workflows, scripts, tests and code comments; grow the detector to the process corpus ... `docs.no-session-narrative` reaches every durable artifact, but its detector scanned only `docs/**/*.md` and root markdown, and nothing had ever swept the rest. The issue named four sites from one grep and called them a floor. Deriving the population instead — a whitespace-joined sweep over every tracked file outside the detector, for the detector's own phrasings plus the attribution and review-round class #812 found — gave 453 sites in 108 files at `fb5592971`, and a second pass for phrasings the first list missed (hyphenated `round-N`, "an earlier version", "the reviewer proved") added residuals in the same files. Every site was classified with #812's three dispositions (CUT / SEVER / KEEP with its sub-kind) under the who-benefits test; the per-site manifests are on the PR. The rejected designs, tested-and-rejected fixtures, measurements and traps stay; the attribution of who found them and the round in which they were found go. The detector's population grows to `.claude/`, `.gitea/`, `.husky/` and `scripts/` regardless of extension, minus the detector and its own test (whose fixtures ARE the phrasings) and minus `scripts/tests/fixtures/` (test data, including decision-record copies — the same reasoning as the records' own exemption, and what keeps the record's depth measurement true), and `--all` lists tracked REGULAR files only — a symlink's content is its target and a gitlink has none. The #812 argument for leaving `docs/superpowers/**` in the population runs the other way here: `--diff` sees only ADDED lines, and 287 of the 453 sites were under 30 days old — this corpus is where narrative is being added, so the advisory nudge has reach. Density agrees: 56 line-mode hits over the 113 regular files the predicate admits, against 9 over 66 docs files before #812. `web/` and C# stay out on the same measurement (3 of 74 PATTERNS-matching sites, ~4,600 files). The predicate did not grow: PATTERNS matched 74 of 453 sites, and widening the word list to the attribution class is the treadmill the withdrawn parity test ran on. The population oracle is restated over segments with the new arms, the synthetic cross product gains the process heads and non-markdown extensions, a fixture witnesses that a tracked symlink is neither scanned nor counted, a `.py.bak` axis separates a by-name exemption from a `startswith` over the same tuple, and eight mutants (drop the process arm, drop the by-name exemption, exempt by `startswith`, drop or add a prefix, drop the fixtures exemption, list only markdown, drop the symlink filter, test the mode per row instead of per path) each redden it. A pre-existing silent drop in `--diff` goes with it: git tab-terminates a `+++` filename that contains a space, and the kept tab made `is_scanned_path` refuse the file with no notice — fixed, with a positive control and its own mutant. Code is unchanged by construction, measured per file type against `origin/main`: Python modules are AST-equal with docstrings stripped, except `#` lines inside the embedded fixture programs (string literals) of three test modules; workflows differ only in `#` lines inside `run:` block scalars; shell, C#, TypeScript and jq are equal with comment lines stripped. The stated exceptions: the detector and its test, 26 vitest titles that carried review-round or severity labels or a reviewer attribution (call sites whose title changed — every changed title line walked back to its `it(` / `it.each(...)(` anchor, so a `' + '` concatenation counts once), two registry note strings and the mutation manifest's prose fields. scripts/tests: 1565 passed. Web: lint, typecheck, 1319 tests green. Closes #876. Decisions-Edit: yes Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PEcBoFw7ctrf3Nb7R7x7wk	2026-09-03 20:51:39 +02:00
3 people	8fd9eae0bf	fix(891): a sourced path is code, so every hook resolves it from its own tree (#903) ... Every hook under `.claude/hooks/` assigned `ETV_HOOK_FIRE_LIB` from `${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-<self>}` and then `. `-SOURCED it. Sourcing is execution, so a file of that name in an env-designated tree ran as code inside the hook before stdin was read and before it could decide anything. Measured on the merge gate before #858 fixed that one hook: a decoy tree's copy printed an `allow` and exited 0. Reachable without an attacker, because husky is a different launcher: `.husky/pre-push` invokes `./.claude/hooks/…` relative to the PUSHED tree, independent of the variable, so a push from one worktree while the environment names another sources the other tree's code into a gate. Sweeps the remaining twelve hooks together (population derived from `git ls-files`), reconciles the second resolution inside `scripts/hook-fire-log.sh` itself, and requires the root to OWN the sink (`-ef`, not `-e`). The static guard pins the preamble BYTE-FOR-BYTE — a withdrawal, after a lexical rule was defeated by five successive shapes. Also pins two arms of the checker that were unsubsumed AND unpinned: the begin call's presence and its missing stdout-mode token. `…_LOSES_its_instrumentation_…` looked like their proof and was not — it asserts only that the fault list is non-empty, and a stripped hook trips four arms, so deleting either left the suite green. fixes #891 refs #858, #859, #776 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UYNbVwgVszv6Pum7ZuGd75 Co-authored-by: Timothy <timothy@noreply.gitea.tblindustries.be>	2026-08-30 21:41:19 +00:00
3 people	3b386649bf	feat(790): execute every MUTATION grade instead of asserting it (#815) ... Every `MUTATION` row of `docs/guard-inventory.md` now carries a DECLARED clause mutation that is applied to an isolated copy of the repository on every suite run, with the row's own named test required to go red carrying a declared diagnostic. Manifest and MUTATION rows are compared for set equality both directions; the other 22 guards each carry a stated reason, compared the same way. Measured rather than assumed: 12 of 13 guards admit a single-clause mutation; `instrumentation_faults` does not, and that entry carries the surviving finer mutation, re-run every suite. Nine cold cross-family review rounds. Rounds 1, 2, 7 and 8 each found real mechanism defects — two mutations that measured nothing, an incomplete git-environment sanitisation, a reset that restored its own mutant, and a proof of that fix which was not itself isolated. All fixed and witnessed red. fixes #790 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Timothy <timothy@noreply.gitea.tblindustries.be>	2026-08-22 13:12:15 +00:00