timothy/ersatztv
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 57 Pull Requests 6 Actions Packages Projects Releases 9 Wiki Activity

[PROBE — DO NOT MERGE] ersatztv#672 experiment A: is a pull_request workflow definition head-resolved? #693

Closed
timothy wants to merge 1 commits from scratch/672-head-a into scratch/672-base-a
pull from: scratch/672-head-a
merge into: :scratch/672-base-a
Conversation 0 Commits 1 Files Changed 1
+17 -222
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
timothy ccbc4abbe0 scratch(672): probe head A — rewrite review-verdict.yml in the PR itself
Review verdict / Set review-verdict status (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Details
review-verdict/h10-PROBE672 ersatztv#672 probe: posted by a HEAD-supplied workflow definition
Details 
Throwaway. Answers Done-when box 1: if this rewritten definition is what runs,
Gitea resolves a pull_request workflow definition from the PR head.

Posts a distinct probe context, never the real review-verdict/h10.
Not for merge.
 2026-07-28 21:06:21 +02:00