timothy
5b0e0e7ea5
Build ErsatzTV Image / CI toolchain image resolves (pull_request) Successful in 16s
PR Gates / Docs update reminder (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Delimiter ban (release path) (pull_request) Successful in 28s
PR Gates / decisions lifecycle (pull_request) Successful in 35s
PR Gates / CI image pin matches docker/ci (pull_request) Successful in 14s
PR Gates / Fix proofs (Proves trailers) (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Review verdict / Set review-verdict status (pull_request_target) Successful in 33s
review-verdict/h10 Review-verdict: MERGEABLE @ 5b0e0e7 (base: main)
PR Gates / Script lint and tests (ruff + pytest) (pull_request) Successful in 5m32s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & test (.NET) (pull_request) Successful in 9m29s
Build ErsatzTV Image / EF migration integrity (SQLite + MySql) (pull_request) Successful in 6m22s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Build & push image (amd64) (pull_request) Skipped
Build ErsatzTV Image / Functional E2E (curl + UI contracts) (pull_request) Successful in 6m8s
Build ErsatzTV Image / API docs in sync (OpenAPI + endpoint index) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Build ErsatzTV Image / Formatting (changed .cs conform to .editorconfig) (pull_request) Successful in 7s
Two tidy-ups from the final review, both in the withdrawal note added last commit. "three successive attempts at one were each false in a different way" is autobiography — it only parses for someone who watched the review (`docs.no-session-narrative`). The durable content is the MECHANISM, which the same sentence already gives: any such summary generalizes from the injected token, which `permissions:` scopes, to every credential a job can reach, which it does not touch. The count is in the commit messages, where it belongs. The note's closing clause restated "a collaborator's own token is a route with no workflow at all" immediately before the pre-existing sentence saying exactly that. Dropped, and "the precise facts are each stated on their own below" went with it — inaccurate once the SHAPE fact had been moved INTO the note. Kept deliberately: the note itself, and the concrete falsifying case (`RENOVATE_TOKEN` is referenced by `renovate.yml`, one of the five holding `code: read`). That is "what was rejected and why, so it is not re-adopted", which the doc rule protects — and the counterexample is a fact none of the three summary versions contained. Decisions-Edit: yes Refs: #748
ErsatzTV
ErsatzTV lets you transform your media library into a personalized, live TV experience - complete with EPG, channel scheduling, and seamless streaming to all your devices. Rediscover your content, your way.
How It Works
- Install ErsatzTV: Download and set up the server on your system.
- Add Your Media: Connect your media libraries and collections.
- Create Channels: Design and schedule your own live channels.
- Stream Anywhere: Watch on any device with IPTV and EPG support.
Key Features
- Custom channels: Create and schedule your own live TV channels.
- IPTV & EPG: Stream with IPTV and Electronic Program Guide support.
- Hardware Transcoding: High-performance streaming with hardware acceleration (NVENC, QSV, VAAPI, AMF, VideoToolbox)
- Media Server Integration: Connect Plex, Jellyfin, Emby and more.
- Music & Subtitles: Mix music videos and enjoy subtitle support.
- Open Source: Free, open, and community-driven project.
Documentation
Documentation is available at ersatztv.org.
License
This project is inspired by pseudotv-plex and the dizquetv fork and is released under the zlib license.