4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
timothy	8f6d4f4432	fix(706,707,711): fence the review-verdict write on the timeline retarget count ... Three related defects in the `review-verdict/h10` gate, all surfaced by the cross-family review of PR #705. #706 race 1 — a stale run could overwrite a fresher verdict, permanently. The race was reproduced live rather than reasoned about (Gitea 1.25.4): with every other workflow stripped, probe PR #722 showed run 7520 (`opened`) finishing 20s AFTER run 7521 (`synchronize`) started. `pull_request_target` runs for one PR genuinely overlap, older finishing last. The issue proposed serializing with a non-cancelling concurrency group. That is REFUTED by measurement: with the group active, runs 7528/7529 still overlapped and 7528 ended 36s after 7529 began. A first probe appeared to show the group working — a negative control with no `concurrency:` key at all showed the same cancellations, revealing Gitea auto-cancels superseded `push` runs on its own and the probe had measured that, not the group. The auto-cancel does not extend to `pull_request_target`. The fix leaves the runs unserialized and instead makes an overtaken run decline to write: count `change_target_branch` events on the PR timeline at start and again just before the POST, and post nothing if the count moved. The COUNT is the key because the branch NAME is ABA-vulnerable (`main -> S -> main` reads `main` at both ends — how #698 route 1 forged its exemption). Abstaining is a handoff, not a stall: every retarget fires `edited`, so the event that makes a run abstain has already queued its successor. `updated_at` was rejected as the key precisely because it moves for comments/labels, which queue nothing. #706 race 2 — a human BLOCKED landing in the unclosable window between the pre-POST re-read and the POST was silently turned green. After an exemption `success` the job now re-reads the per-POST history and repairs its own status to `pending` if a human verdict appeared above a high-water mark taken just before the write. The repair is `pending`, never a copy of the human's state. The id comparison is load-bearing: a presence test would fire forever on a base-mismatched verdict and deadlock that PR's exemption. #707 — `pr-changed-files.sh` bound `.base.ref` and `.head.sha` across the enumeration but never `.base.sha`, so an ordinary advance of `main` mid-paging could drop a code path from an offset-paged diff and leave a complete-looking docs-only list. Now bound from the JSON already fetched (no new round trips). #711 — `.codex/` added to PROTECTED. It mirrors `.claude/hooks/` byte for byte, including the merge-consent hook, so the "a PR that can weaken the gate cannot exempt itself" rule had an incomplete path list. Latent today (untracked), live the moment anyone tracks it. Residuals are stated, not implied: a retarget inside the final round-trip, and the repair being itself a read-then-write. Gitea's status API has no compare-and-set, so neither reaches zero; both now fail toward `pending`. Tests: 398 pass in scripts/tests. Each new guard was mutation-checked — the fence's motion comparison, the untrusted-count gate, the repair POST and the id high-water mark were each neutered in turn and the intended test went red while its positive control stayed green. fixes #706 fixes #707 fixes #711 Decisions-Edit: yes	2026-08-03 21:41:16 +02:00
timothyandClaude Opus 5	f523fc535d	fix(698): bind the base, constrain the bot exemption by content, re-derive unattributable successes ... The `review-verdict/h10` exemption path decided from mutable or unattributed PR state, and a machine-written `success` was never revalidated. Three routes, one root cause, so one change. Route 1 (reproduced live as probe PR #703, closed unmerged): `/pulls/{n}/files` diffs against the PR's LIVE base, so retargeting moves the answer without moving the head sha. A PR opened into `main` and retargeted mid-run enumerated docs-only and was granted `h10=success` while its diff against `main` carried a C# file; retargeting back reclassified nothing. `scripts/pr-changed-files.sh` now takes the expected base branch as a REQUIRED 5th argument (optional would be a silent opt-out) and checks it before and after paging; the workflow passes it from the `pull_request_target` payload, which a retarget cannot rewrite, and `edited` is in `types:` so a retarget reclassifies. A pinned two-sha diff would close route 1 outright but Gitea 1.25.4 cannot serve one: `compare/{base}...{head}` returns no `files`, and a `--depth=1` fetch of the two shas has no merge base. Measured, not assumed. The residual window is stated in the code and the record rather than papered over. Route 2: `pull_request.user.login` is the PR's immutable CREATOR while its head is not, so pushing code onto an open Renovate branch kept the exemption. The bot exemption now also requires EVERY path to be a dependency manifest — a set measured across all 11 Renovate PRs this repo has had, not guessed. Route 3: the never-overwrite short-circuit exited on ANY `success`, so a forgery obtained once was inherited forever. It now fires only for a status positively identified as a human verdict (non-null `.creator.login` AND a `Review-verdict:` description — measured: user-posted statuses carry a creator, Actions-posted ones carry null). Written in the positive direction so an unrecognised shape is re-derived rather than trusted. The two exemptions are composed, not chained: as an `elif` chain a Renovate docs-only PR lost the docs-only exemption. Caught before commit and pinned by a test. Tests: 17 new cases in scripts/tests/test_pr_changed_files.py, each verified by mutating the clause it covers (8 mutations, 8 kills). Both records trimmed under the 60-line prose ceiling so the corpus tail-boundary check stays calibrated. Does NOT close the class: anyone who can POST a status directly can still impersonate a verdict — that is #697, deliberately left open. Refs: #698 Decisions-Edit: yes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-07-29 19:52:00 +02:00
timothy	5e7623b8d5	fix(648,649): security-review round 2 — close the version-parse hole and the untested caller contract ... Two real defects, and three docs claims that were simply wrong. jq-preflight.sh parsed the version by stripping around the first `-` and `.`, which assumed the format is exactly `jq-X.Y`. A build printing `jq version 1.6` left major empty; the sanity check concatenated major+minor into "6", which is non-empty and all-digits, so it PASSED. The floor comparison then ran `[ "" -lt 1 ]`, which errors — and `set -e` exempts a failing command in an `if` condition, so the conditional read false and the script exited 0 having asserted nothing, after printing a plausible "parsed" line. The silently-untested-axis failure this script exists to eliminate, reproduced inside the script itself. Now parsed by explicit regex, failing closed with a diagnosis when there is no <digits>.<digits> match. Also: `--expect` with no value exited 1 with empty output on both streams. The hook's exit-status check was pinned by nothing: mutating `if files=$(...)` into `files=$(...) || true; files_complete=yes` left the ENTIRE suite green. It survived only by redundancy — the script writes stdout once, right before exit 0, so failures also happen to yield empty stdout and `[ -n "$files" ]` catches it. Safe by accident, which is the exact criticism this branch levels at the old code. Four tests now pin it, with a stub that FAILS while emitting a docs-only list (the one case redundancy cannot absorb) plus a positive control proving the harness can see the difference. Verified: the mutation now turns exactly those tests red. Docs corrections. The record claimed the --expect pin was safe because script-tests is "advisory, not a required check" — false. The merge-consent hook reads the COMBINED status (ci.advisory-red-blocks-the-merge-gate, #598), so firing the tripwire blocks every non-docs-only merge until someone re-pins. Kept anyway, for a stated reason, but no longer described as free. The record also asserted in the present tense that review-verdict.yml checks out the base ref; it has no checkout step at all, so that is now a future-tense requirement on the follow-up. And the documented .status allow-list named GitHub's `removed`, which the code rejects. The drift-guard regex anchored on `?limit=`, so a re-inlined copy written `files?page=1&limit=50` would have walked past it. Decisions-Edit: yes	2026-07-26 22:21:07 +02:00
timothy	2fd798cccf	fix(648,649): one shared PR-file enumeration + an explicit jq version contract ... #649 — the enforced review-verdict.yml guard had drifted strictly WEAKER than the advisory merge-consent hook: four rounds of #643 hardening landed on the copy whose failures produce a human prompt, and never reached the copy that writes the branch-protection-required review-verdict/h10 status. Its fail-closed behaviour on a garbage response was also incidental (an empty `n` erroring a bash conditional to false), not designed. Extract scripts/pr-changed-files.sh as the single implementation both call. Shared MECHANISM, not policy: the two docs-only allow-lists differ deliberately and stay separate. review-verdict.yml now checks out the BASE ref, never the PR head, so a PR cannot rewrite the gate that judges it. #648 — baking jq into docker/ci/Dockerfile provably cannot cover the gate that broke: review-verdict.yml is runs-on:small with no toolchain pin, so it gets the host's jq 1.6 (checked, not assumed). Add scripts/jq-preflight.sh: floor+observable everywhere, and a --expect tripwire on script-tests only — pinning the required merge check would deadlock every merge on a jq bump. Verified by mutation: six guards individually broken, each turning exactly its own test red, then restored byte-identical. fixes #648 fixes #649	2026-07-26 22:21:07 +02:00